AI Visibility Audit — Sample Excerpt

Format demo · Sample scenario: roofing contractors, Minneapolis, MN · Run: 2026-11-02 · Rounds: 1 of 3 · Panel: public web discovery layer (AI-engine panel pending live session — see note)

What this sample is — and is not

This page shows the format of the audit report and the source breakdown behind it. The figures below come from one round of public web search using the same buyer-style wording as the audit questions. That measures the discovery layer — the same public sources AI engines draw on and cite — not AI answers themselves. No ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, or Gemini answer was generated for this sample.

The paid audit replaces this layer with direct answers from 4 AI engines × 3 rounds (20 buyer-style questions each) and reports mention and citation rates across all rounds. Single-round numbers are never reported as findings. If an intended engine is unavailable at run time, it is replaced by Claude or Microsoft Copilot, and the substitution is stated on the report cover and told to you before delivery.

Mini test record: 5 questions, 1 round (public web discovery, 2026-11-02)

#	Buyer question (verbatim)	Main source pages (organic results)	Local businesses named (excerpt)
Q1	best roofing contractors in Minneapolis MN recommendations	Hook Agency's own listicle “9 Best Roofing Companies In Minneapolis”, Expertise.com, ThreeBestRated, BestProsInTown	Northface Construction, Owl Roofing, Kaufman Roofing, Storm Group Roofing, Sela Roofing, Snap Construction, Minnesota Exteriors, Central Roofing
Q2	who should I hire for roof replacement after hail damage Minneapolis	healthstartsinthekitchen listicle, Northland Roofing, Wright at Home, Viking Contractors	Owl Roofing, Kaufman Roofing, Twin City Roofing, Northland Roofing, Wright at Home Roofing, Viking Contractors
Q3	best HVAC companies in Minneapolis MN heating furnace repair	Blue Ox's own listicle (goblueox.com), IndustryOversight, ThreeBestRated	Blue Ox Heating & Air, Pronto Heating & Air, Stafford Home Service, Ray N. Welter, Standard Heating & Air, Hero Plumbing Heating Cooling
Q4	best plumbers in Minneapolis MN recommendations	Expertise.com, HomeGuide, HomeBusinessMag, ThreeBestRated, Thumbtack	Roto-Rooter, TJK Plumbing, Gray Duck Plumbing, Soderlin Plumbing, McQuillan Bros, Cichy's Water & Sewer, Paul Bunyan Plumbing, Bonfe Underground
Q5	best home remodeling contractors Minneapolis MN reviews	HomeGuide, Houzz, ONE AllRatings, Best Pick Reports	A To Z Remodelers & Builders, Titus Contracting, Murphy Bros. Design Build, Bluestem Remodeling, Northrup Remodeling, Crystal Kitchen + Bath

Discovery share-of-voice, roofing questions (2 of 20 shown)

Business	Q1 sources naming it	Q2 sources naming it
Sela Roofing	3	0
Snap Construction	2	0
Kaufman Roofing	1	1
Owl Roofing	1	1
Storm Group Roofing	1	0

What the discovery layer is built from (observed)

“Best of” listicles (including one published by an agency), Expertise/ThreeBestRated-type directories, and review platforms. No business appeared on the strength of its own website alone.

Two real observations from this run:

Near-name collision: Q1 surfaced “A to Z Construction Inc.” (roofing) while Q5 surfaced “A To Z Remodelers & Builders” (remodeling) — highly similar names, different businesses. AI answers and directory crawls can confuse such near names; the paid report's consistency checklist scores this risk for the audited client.
An agency's own content is a cited source: it is part of the source layer those answers are built from — in this run, the first source for Q1 was a listicle published by Hook Agency itself.

Consistency checklist (excerpt)

Near-name collision check — a similarly named business exists in an adjacent trade (observed in this run for the “A to Z” name family). Verify the client's name is unambiguous across GBP, site, and directories. Status: Gap risk flagged
Listicle/directory presence — client should appear in the same directory set that recurs across questions. Status: to be scored per client in the full run

What the paid audit includes

The same 20 buyer-style questions, run on 4 AI answer engines, 3 rounds each — mention and citation rates reported across all rounds, never a single screenshot.
A share-of-voice table: every business named across all rounds, ranked by mentions — the client highlighted against the top 5 competitors.
A source map: which source types the engines pulled from, with the concrete source pages observed.
The consistency checklist above in full (GBP completeness and category fit; name/address/phone consistency; review volume/recency; answer-ready factual pages), each item marked Pass / Gap / Not checked with the evidence seen.
One re-run of the identical test 30 days later, included in the $99 one-time price.

Noise disclosure (mandatory in every report): AI answers are non-deterministic; the same question can return different businesses on different runs. That is why the audit uses 3 rounds and reports rates across all rounds, never a single screenshot. A one-run number is not a finding. We do not promise that this audit — or the checklist fixes — will change AI answers, rankings, leads, or revenue.

Sample scenario is illustrative, not a named client of any agency. Paid audits use a client location the agency picks; we never ask for access to the agency's or the client's accounts. No medical, legal, or financial-services end clients. Figures above are from one round on the public web discovery layer, run 2026-11-02. The paid audit replaces this layer with direct answers from 4 AI engines × 3 rounds.